![]() |
| This blog is a good place to start to learn more...... |
Aid–based approaches, while sometimes deeply rooted in the best of intentions, do not always address what the intended recipients actually need to improve their lives. After reading, "Haiti Doesn’t Need Your Old T-Shirt," by Charles Kenney and watching the brief video, “A Day Without Dignity," the dumping of leftover t-shirts and shoes on the residents of Haiti and Nigeria opened my eyes to the problems with some aid based efforts. Also, the discussion of how the US food aid program has put native rice farmers out of business in Haiti and textile workers out of jobs in other countries were two strong examples that the best intentions do not always result in the intended outcomes, unless the intended outcome was to achieve some misguided notion that what is best for us (Americans. Corporations and the federal government) must also be best for those being “helped.” According to the reading, the intention is all too often to unload our surplus of goods and send our leftovers to less fortunate communities are Pop-Tarts really beneficial to anyone?
Community based efforts are much more far-sighted than their aid based counterparts. The grass-roots types of efforts that were illustrated in our readings and in the videos we watched had a much more long-lasting effect for the communities involved. In addition, the people who were affected by the issues had a vested interest in the process of affecting solutions. In “Pray the Devil Home,” Leymah Gbowee talked about the process the women implemented to achieve the intended effect on their situation. What was especially interesting to me was how the women spent one hour after each peaceful protest to conduct an analysis of the protest. The goal of this hour was, in essence, to see what had worked, what hadn’t and how to improve their efforts. This was truly a community effort conducted by the affected community and it definitely got noticed. The women were able to achieve their goals and so much more. Their efforts became a model and an inspiration for other global efforts in the approach to creating peaceful communities.
For me, the blog post “Before You Give, Think” was the most helpful. The seven steps listed provide even the novice explorer (like me) in the field of advocacy, domestic or international, with clear guidelines to follow when embarking on the “mission” to give. Steps two and three; reflecting on your initial emotions and questioning yourself, are especially important to me in the process. They are definitely two things I have not done in the past. I am more of an emotional participant in that I get caught up in my own emotions and have to “do something” right away. This advice also aligned well with the knowledge I gained during LEAD Day at the state house this week. The importance of researching your cause and creating a plan was stressed by all of the panelists that participated in the workshops. They did speak of the need for being passionate about your cause when participating in grass-roots advocacy, but Representative Enriques made a point to explain that being passionate did not necessarily insinuate a need to be emotional. He instead advised that we harness our passion on an issue, learn as much as we can about it, reflect on what we have learned and then take the time to develop a plan that best addresses it. Finally, he stressed the need for constant analysis of our actions, adapting our approach or plan, and remaining true to our passion and cause. All of the information I have been able to gain through this process will assist me in becoming the advocate I now know I was meant to become.
Watch this video for a community-based approach on a domestic level.



