It was the rapid industrialization and urbanization following the conclusion of
the Civil War and the abolition of slavery that brought about the need for the Settlement House Movement in the northeast and midwest. The birth of social work was a result of this turn in focus from the charity organizations of the time immediately following the civil war, to more of a social justice focus as evidenced by the settlement house movement (Netting, 2005.) This need was compounded by the waves of immigrants landing on America's shores in search of a better life. The establishment of Hull House (1888) in Chicago by Jane Addams and other such settlement houses across the north provided a place for people to not only access services, but to also meet with others, share ideas and concerns and gather their collective resources in a collaborative effort to improve social conditions. While Addams and others were working on the totality of the problems of the time, preventing disease, problems with housing and child labor laws on a larger scale, social workers like Mary Richmond were working with the individuals to empower them to become advocates for themselves - Richmond brought the focus from the individual to place an emphasis on the greater social concerns. This would later be considered the root of the systems theory as Richmond examined the interaction between the person and their environment. These early settlement leaders and pioneers in social work would have a lasting impact on major social issues like women's suffrage, civil rights, labor laws, housing and child welfare (socialworkers.org, NASW)
Unfortunately, the country would once again face difficult times and the "Reaganomics" of the 1980's would wreak havoc on social programs. Attacks by the Reagan administration on the welfare system would abound as the income gap between the socio-economic classes in America would continue to widen. A look to Americans to "pull themselves up by their bootstraps" placed the responsibility for one's situation squarely on their own shoulders, removing blame or responsibility from our government. The "War on Terror" that began after the attacks of September 11th would see more cuts in social programs as America's financial resources were diverted to our nation's defense. This would make it even more difficult for social workers to find the services and programs to assist their clients. These cumulative cuts would continue to burden the disappearing middle and ever-growing lower class leading to where we are today. The income gap has never been as wide as it is. For macro social workers, the need to partner with our community members and neighbors for social change and self-advocacy is apparent. The recent "Occupy" movement has swept the country and is already showing the power citizens can achieve when they organize collaboratively for a common goal.
This 1964 Johnson campaign ad could easily apply to the economic situation in America today.
Sources:
academic.cengage.com/resource_uploads/downloads/0534640435_52807.pdf.
Hardina, Donna. 2003. Linking citizen participation to empowerment practice.
Journal of Community Practice. 11(4) doi. 10.1300.J125v11n04_02
Historyofsocialwork.org. 2009
Netting, F. Ellen. 2005. The future of macro social work. Advances in Social
Work. 6 (1). 51-59
socialworkers.org/pressroom/features/general/history.asp
Valocchi, Stephen. A way of thinking about the history of community organizing.
trincoll.edu/depts/ten/valocchi.htm

No comments:
Post a Comment